Potentials and Challenges for Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland - and for the European Union

coverFebruary 2014 - Drawing on the results of a wide range of ESPON applied research projects, this report highlights the territorial development themes, challenges and opportunities that need to be addressed jointly by the Partner States and the EU Member States while, in addition, identifying the complementarities between each of these four states and the EU.

ESPON Territorial Observation No. 10 on Potentials and Challenges for Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland - and for the European Union is available below.



More information

Summary of key findings

Contact the ESPON Coordination Unit at [email protected]

ESPON Territorial Observation No. 10

Potentials and Challenges for
Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland
- and for the European Union

Policy relevant key findings

Territorial benchmarking is nourishing the understanding of Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland in Europe. Key characteristics for policy makers to take into account as starting point for policy reflection and further cooperation between Partner States and EU Member States can be listed as follows:

  • The Partner States perform better in relation to the smart growth objective than most EU Member States.
  • In terms of sustainable growth, Partner States generate considerable amounts of hydroelectric power, three countries (Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland) have lower green-house gas emissions per GDP unit than any EU Member State, and two (Iceland and Norway) have a high share of renewable energy.
  • Concerning inclusive growth, Partner States have a wealth of highly educated people who can contribute directly to the shift to a knowledge-based economy. In addition, there are less people at risk of poverty in the Partner States than in most other European countries.
  • Partner States display in general high population growth but have very different population densities. Two countries (Switzerland and Liechtenstein) show positive population development due to in-migration.
  • Transport systems are generally well developed. Switzerland and Liechtenstein have a particularly high motorway density, which results in a high level of road accessibility.
  • Switzerland has a particular position concerning rail transport as many transit routes cross the country and there are good links to many major European cities. In Norway the main railway hub is Oslo.
  • While important global and European air traffic gateways concentrate in the core of Europe, Zurich, Oslo and Reykjavik show good prospects as hubs in the air transport network.
  • Iceland and Norway are important sea gateways to the Arctic, while the challenge for Switzerland and Liechtenstein is to minimise travel costs to nearest sea ports.
  • Concerning the role of cities, Zurich and Oslo have important roles to play in business networks.
  • Switzerland and Liechtenstein are strong players in knowledge networking in the core of Europe, while Reykjavik, Akureyri, Oslo, Trondheim and Bergen form university hubs in the north.
  • The Alps play an important role as tourist attraction for international and European tourism, while Norway and Iceland are appealing for nature tourism in high numbers in relation to the local population.
  • Sparsely populated regions in Norway and Iceland are the type of regions mostly challenged by out-migration.
  • Mountain areas in Partner States are in general impacted by and economically vulnerable to climate change.
  • In spite of problems with public service provision, islands dispose of potential in the form of unspoiled landscapes and rich ecosystems.
  • Islands and coastal areas of Norway and Iceland are exposed to sea level rise, storms and flooding and the North Sea is a hotspot for wind energy.
  • In terms of cooperation culture Partner States are active in Interreg programmes, and particularly Norway is cooperating actively in many programmes.
  • The regions of Partner States participate only at an average level of intensity in Interreg programmes, compared with regions of EU Member States.
  • In particular cross-border cooperation is hampered by differences in administration and legal systems, whereas transport and fare pricing policies seem to stimulate cooperation across borders.

Documents

TO10 - Potentials and Challenges for Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Switzerland - and for the European Union

  • Acrobat Document | 10105KB

Map 1 Territorial patterns of innovation

  • Acrobat Document | 4338KB

Map 2 Impact of migration on population in 2050

  • Acrobat Document | 4077KB

Map 3 European wide road network

  • Acrobat Document | 23203KB

Map 4 Commuting flows in the Upper Rhine

  • Acrobat Document | 36979KB

Map 5 European wide rail network

  • Acrobat Document | 11783KB

Map 6 Airport traffic and endowment North Iceland, in Jura & Valais and in North Calotte compare to European measures

  • Acrobat Document | 3682KB

Map 7 Flight connections and total aircraft movements in North Calotte airports

  • Acrobat Document | 933KB

Map 8 Intensity of marine use. Shipping lanes

  • Acrobat Document | 8204KB

Map 9 Travel costs to access the nearest maritime port

  • Acrobat Document | 2136KB

Map 10 Position of European cities as intercontinental (a) gatekeepers

  • Acrobat Document | 5610KB

Map 10 Position of European cities as intercontinental (b) representatives

  • Acrobat Document | 5617KB

Map 10 Position of European cities as intercontinental (c) platforms

  • Acrobat Document | 5567KB

Map 11 Knowledge networking regions in Europe

  • Acrobat Document | 4992KB

Map 12 Geographic specificities identified in each LAU-2 unit

  • Acrobat Document | 67691KB

Map 13 Environmental pressures

  • Acrobat Document | 29651KB

Map 14 Change in exposure to coastal flooding

  • Acrobat Document | 7837KB

Map 15 Avalanche hazards

  • Acrobat Document | 6807KB

Map 16 Geothermal fields in Iceland

  • Acrobat Document | 7711KB

Map 17 Number of partners INTERREG IVB

  • Acrobat Document | 5075KB

Map 18 Territorial Cooperation in different types of regions

  • Acrobat Document | 4723KB

Figure 1 Traffic lights Smart growth

  • Acrobat Document | 101KB

Figure 2 Traffic lights Sustainable growth

  • Acrobat Document | 134KB

Figure 3 Traffic lights inclusive growth

  • Acrobat Document | 111KB

Figure 4 Percentage point difference between share of population living in current functional urban areas (FUA) of different sizes and rural areas in 1961 and 2011

  • Excel Document | 17KB

Figure 5 The five most important barriers for an enhanced cross-border cooperation, Figure 6 The most relevant policies for increased cross-border cooperation

  • Excel Document | 48KB